Open menu Close menu
Computational engineering · Chile

Force, computed

Multiphysics computational engineering for mining, industry and private studies. Every model ships validated, with a conclusion a project manager can use without opening the software.

CFD simulation of multiphase flow inside an industrial transfer box
Velocity field · transfer chute · multiphase CFD
Velocity · m/s
06.212.4
Validated
±3 %
Mean deviation against field measurement
48 h
To answer a request with scope and schedule
3 lines
Fluids, structures and particles in one team
What we do

One team for fluids, structures and particles

Three service lines, one standard of convergence, validation and traceability.

Computational fluid dynamics Finite element analysis Discrete element method Read the glossary

Vis Numerica · Flow

CFD, hydraulics and slurry transport

Vis Numerica · Struct

FEA, fatigue and structural dynamics

Vis Numerica · Particle

DEM for chutes, conveyors and milling

Who we serve

We work where the decision is expensive

Two engineers inspect a transfer station at a Chilean mineral processing plant
Site scene · greyscale

Mining

Concentrators, crushing plants, slurry transport and tailings. Field experience in Chilean operations.

Industry

Continuous processes, material handling, pressure equipment and support structures.

Private studies

Expert reviews, third-party design verification and technical backing for investment decisions.

Evidence

A result is reviewed, not admired

Three ways of looking at the same run. Everything that moves here is moved by you: nothing plays on its own and nothing runs ahead of the reading.

Demonstration

Demonstration figures and fields: they show the format of a delivery, not an executed project. They are replaced by real cases with their validation before publishing.

What the redesign changes

The same scale on both sides; without that a comparison compares nothing. The flat plate throws the stream against the wall, which is where wear shows up. The spoon delivers it attached to the loading point.

Velocity field of the transfer chute: original geometry left of the divider, redesign to the right After
Before
Velocity field · transfer chute · same bound

How the chute fills

Six instants of the start-up transient. Steady state hides the exact moment the stream detaches, which is the one that drives the redesign.

t = 0.70 s
Velocity magnitude · start-up transient · multiphase CFD

The scale decides what you see

The same field and the same bound, three scales. Rainbow invents edges where the field is continuous and flattens the gradients that matter. Viridis and cividis are perceptually uniform and survive print and colour vision deficiency.

Same field · same 12.4 m/s bound · only the scale changes
Velocity · m/s
06.212.4

Rainbow and jet are banned in deliveries. Viridis for screen, cividis for print.

Method

We model what moves the decision

If the geometry does not change the result, it does not enter the mesh. Everything that does is documented.

Demonstration
%

3 of 3 points within ±5 %

Declared before the run. Moving it here changes the verdict, never the measurement.

Table · Validation extract, Flow case
Control point Simulated Measured Status
Discharge jet 12.4 m/s 12.1 m/s ±2.5 % within criterion
Slurry depth 0.42 m 0.44 m ±4.5 % within criterion
Flow per launder 318 m³/h 312 m³/h ±1.9 % within criterion
  1. 01
    Scope We define the decision the model must support and the acceptance criterion.
  2. 02
    Model Geometry, mesh and the minimum sufficient physics. Mesh sensitivity documented.
  3. 03
    Convergence Residuals, balances and cut-off criteria declared before running.
  4. 04
    Validation Checked against field measurement, testing or a published reference case.
  5. 05
    Conclusion One page with the recommendation, its limits and what would change the answer.

Convergence, unadorned

Run residuals on a logarithmic scale. The cut-off is declared before running; what decides when to stop is the slowest curve, not the showiest one.

1 1e-1 1e-2 1e-3 1e-4 1e-5 1e-6 0 50 100 150 200 Residual Iteration Declared cut-off Continuity Momentum Turbulence

  • Continuity Iteration 74
  • Momentum Iteration 44
  • Turbulence Iteration 106

Normalised residuals · cut-off declared at 1e-4 · demonstration run

Table · Residual per iteration
Iteration Series Residual
0 Continuity 2.0e-1
50 Continuity 3.5e-4
100 Continuity 3.9e-5
150 Continuity 1.4e-5
200 Continuity 4.7e-6
0 Momentum 5.6e-2
50 Momentum 5.7e-5
100 Momentum 1.1e-5
150 Momentum 3.0e-6
200 Momentum 1.4e-6
0 Turbulence 8.0e-2
50 Turbulence 7.5e-4
100 Turbulence 1.3e-4
150 Turbulence 4.2e-5
200 Turbulence 2.3e-5
About us

Rigour, clarity and relevance, in that order

A Chilean multiphysics computational engineering consultancy. Bilingual delivery from the start, field experience in mining operations, and an answer with scope and schedule within 48 working hours.

To confirm

These are published once the owner confirms them against the register. Until then they do not appear on the site: a short fact sheet beats an optimistic one.

Rigour

Convergence, validation and traceability documented in every delivery. The cut-off criterion is declared before the run, not after looking at the result.

Clarity

The report explains the decision, not the method. The executive summary fits on one page; the detail, the annexes and the files go underneath.

Relevance

We model what moves the decision. If a physics does not change the answer, it is declared out of scope instead of billed.

Company facts

Disciplines
CFD · FEA · DEM
Based in
Santiago, Chile
Delivery languages
Spanish and English, from the start
Response to a request
48 working hours, with scope and schedule
Field
Chilean mining operations
How an engagement works

What gets signed before the first run

Scope, acceptance criterion and payment terms are agreed in writing before a mesh exists.

What the client receives

  • Report with a one-page executive summary
  • Methodology, results and validation documented
  • Mesh sensitivity and residual trace annexes
  • Result files and processed geometry
  • Closing presentation with the client team
  • The same delivery in Spanish, at no extra cost

Commercial terms

Currency
UF plus VAT, at the value on the invoicing date
Invoicing
50 % against scope acceptance · 50 % against report delivery
Proposal validity
30 days
Confidentiality
Reciprocal, 3 years from service close
Revisions
One round of comments included; further rounds are quoted hourly
Files
Results and processed geometry remain with the client
Schedule
Counts from receipt of the geometry and the operating data

Every document is issued coded and revisioned: VN-P-2026-031 · Rev. A

Acceptance criterion

The criterion is agreed before the run. If the model does not reach it, we say so and the conclusion stage is not billed.

Scope

Build the scope in three steps

Pick line, asset and decision. You get the typical scope, the deliverables and a reference schedule, and the form field below is written for you to edit.

Line
Flow — CFD
Typical scope
  • Equipment geometry with a stretch upstream and downstream
  • Mesh with the boundary layer resolved where wear matters
  • Mesh sensitivity documented with GCI
Deliverables
  • Velocity and pressure fields on the agreed sections
  • Validation table against site measurement
  • Report with the conclusion on the first page
Reference schedule

3 to 5 weeks

Struct — FEA
Typical scope
  • Global beam model and solid submodel at the critical nodes
  • Modal analysis to rule out resonance with operation
  • Fatigue with the measured or code load spectrum
Deliverables
  • Stress and fatigue life maps per node
  • Comparison against gauges, testing or a reference case
  • Report with the conclusion on the first page
Reference schedule

4 to 6 weeks

Particle — DEM
Typical scope
  • Calibration with site material: angle of repose and box discharge
  • Geometry of the chute, the skirt and the receiving conveyor
  • Sensitivity to particle size and moisture
Deliverables
  • Trajectories, relative wear and spillage balance
  • Record of the calibration and its tests
  • Report with the conclusion on the first page
Reference schedule

4 to 7 weeks

Contact

Tell us which decision you have to make

We answer within 48 business hours with scope, schedule and price. Delivery in Spanish and English from the start.

Site, equipment and the decision the model must support.